Obituary Genealogy Mysteries: Why Do Some Family Members Get More Attention?

Snapshot of RootsMagic Narrative Report Starter

Have you ever noticed how some obituaries in genealogy single out one family member while mentioning others only briefly? It could be a child’s name, occupation, or some other specific detail that stands out. This trend isn’t just a quirk—it can be a fascinating clue about family dynamics, social history, and even community values. So, what does it mean when one family member is highlighted while others receive a mere nod?

In a previous writing challenge, I asked viewers about an obituary for Margaret Lally that gave extra information about her son Frank. The obituary noted his role as a lieutenant in Cleveland’s fire department but did not treat his siblings the same. The responses I received were insightful and thought-provoking, which sparked a deeper dive into the theories behind these obituary mysteries.

Why Are Family Members Listed in Obituaries With Different Genealogy Information?

Many wonder, "How are family members listed in an obituary?"

The common answer is "List family members in order of closest relation to the deceased, starting with the spouse and ending with other relatives." That doesn't explain the variance in the obituary above, particularly the singling out of Frank.

Let’s explore some possible reasons why Frank’s role was highlighted while his siblings were hardly mentioned. Along the way, we’ll also touch on how family members are typically listed in obituaries and what it means when this format breaks away from the norm.

Theory 1: Only Local Child Available

One viewer, JM Myers, suggested that Frank may have been the only child still living in Cleveland, making him the easiest for a reporter to reach. This would be particularly likely if the obituary was written by a local journalist or the newspaper took an active role in creating community obituaries.

When family members are distant, details about them can get lost, resulting in a name-only mention. However, as we see more family-written obituaries today, this explanation may not hold up in every case. Modern obituaries are often family-driven or handled through funeral homes as paid placements rather than news articles. So, while location could be a factor, it doesn’t fully explain Frank’s sole highlight—but it’s certainly a theory worth considering.

Theory 2: The Family Member Who Paid for the Obituary Wrote It

Another theory Myers proposed is that the family member who paid for the obituary had more influence over its content. This might mean that Frank, or someone close to him, organized and financed the obituary for Margaret. If so, that person would naturally decide which details to include or exclude.

Imagine, for example, if there were family tensions, estrangements, or even preferences for keeping certain people unnamed. Or perhaps Frank’s role in the Cleveland Fire Department was emphasized to connect him with the local community, not necessarily to overshadow his siblings. When writing obituaries in genealogy, it’s worth considering whether the obituary might reflect these subtle choices or family dynamics.

Theory 3: Funeral Home Wrote the Obituary

Sometimes, funeral homes may take charge of obituary content, especially if they’re given limited family information. In Frank’s case, maybe he was the primary contact person, so the funeral home based the obituary on the details he provided. Or maybe Frank felt comfortable sharing his occupation while his siblings preferred privacy.

If this obituary was indeed written by a funeral home, it might feel slightly “off” or lacking in detail compared to a family-written version. This theory highlights a valuable point for genealogists: always consider who might have been consulted in creating an obituary. If the information seems lopsided, it could mean that only one family member was involved.

↪️ Do you want to write a family history book?

Grab your copy of this FREE Writing Guide:

laptop and writing notes with title Free Guide: 5 Steps to Quickly Write Family Histories

Theory 4: Limited Family Knowledge

Finally, Myers speculated that Frank could have been the only child with a strong connection to or knowledge of the family’s history. This happens frequently in obituaries. If the person writing it doesn’t know much about other relatives, they might stick with the details they know, even if it means omitting the names or roles of siblings.

This presents a unique challenge for genealogists when writing obituaries. When younger family members write obituaries, they might use nicknames or even overlook certain relatives. In this case, it’s very possible that Frank’s connection to his mother’s story naturally put him at the forefront.

Why “Breaks” in Obituary Format Matter to Genealogists

So, what does it mean when an obituary breaks the standard format of listing each family member? For genealogists, these quirks can be clues. Traditional obituaries tend to follow a set structure, listing immediate family members with basic information and noting any significant life achievements. But when there’s an imbalance—like Frank’s prominent mention while his siblings are only briefly listed—it suggests there might be something more to investigate.

In genealogy, understanding obituaries means reading between the lines. Each deviation from the standard format might reflect family dynamics, community ties, or personal decisions made by those left behind. Sometimes, the absence of information says as much as the information itself.

What About Your Family?

Have you seen similar patterns in your own family history? When it comes to obituaries in genealogy, these differences can help us piece together untold family stories and discover relationships that aren’t immediately obvious. Drop a comment below and share your thoughts on these theories. Why do you think Frank was singled out in this case? Have you come across similar situations in your research?

Thank you to JM Myers and everyone who contributes to our community discussions. These conversations don’t just help us learn—they inspire us to preserve family stories with greater understanding and care.